Skip to content
Back to all articles

Bleeding after the menopause

This is the most important signal in this set of articles, and the simplest to explain: any vaginal bleeding after your periods stopped more than a year ago should be assessed by a doctor, without delay.

4 min read

> 12 months

without a period is what makes any bleeding a reason for an appointment

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), NG12

202,638

women followed for 16 years: CA 125 used as screening detected more cancers without reducing mortality

UKCTOCS trial (The Lancet)

What counts, exactly

Any bleeding after more than twelve months without a period counts. It does not have to be heavy: a trace, once, is enough to justify the appointment.

During the transition to menopause it is different — there, irregular cycles are expected, and what makes sense is to mention them if they are very heavy or very frequent. The "more than a year" rule is what separates the two situations.

Why it is assessed without delay

In most cases the cause is benign, and an assessment is the right way to confirm that. It can be endometrial atrophy, a polyp, an effect of medication — common and treatable situations.

Even so, it is one of the signals the British guidelines place on a fast referral pathway, because in a minority of cases it corresponds to something that is resolved far better when found early. Assessing quickly is what allows reassurance to come quickly, almost always.

What the assessment usually involves

This varies from person to person and it is the doctor who decides, but it helps to know that the usual path starts with a conversation and a gynaecological examination, and often includes an ultrasound to look at the endometrium.

There is nothing you need to arrange beforehand. What helps is noting when it happened, how often, and what medication you are taking — hormone therapy in particular, if that applies.

And what is not the way

There is one answer that comes up a lot and does not serve:

  • Ordering a tumour marker such as CA 125 neither replaces the assessment nor brings it forward. In a trial that followed more than 200,000 women for 16 years, CA 125 used as screening detected more cancers and did not reduce mortality.
  • Waiting to see whether it happens again postpones the one thing that resolves it, which is looking.
  • Searching online gives the worst possible combination: the rarest case presented as the most likely.
  • Take the EasyCheckUp, which recognises this signal and turns it into a concrete step to bring to your doctor.

Sources

Keep reading

Back to resources

Prepare your next conversation with your doctor today

Five minutes of questions. A plan to discuss. Your answers do not stay on the platform.

Start EasyCheckUp